View Cart
0 Items | Total: US$0.00
Welcome,      Register

You are here

SEC0300 - PAN 9.0 Routing - BGP (Part 2)

Rating: 
5
Average: 5 (1 vote)
Difficulty Level: 
0
Lab Document: 
<Please login to see the content>
Video Download: 
Title: SEC0300 - Video Download $14.00
Purchase SEC0300 - Video Download $14.00

The video shows you how to configure BGP routing on Palo Alto firewall. We will start with basic BGP peering establishment using iBGP and eBGP. We will then look at different way to manipulate routes with summarization, suppression, import and export. The lab finishes with a demonstration of inter-VR BGP peering.

Part 2 of this video covers BGP route manipulation

Topic:

  • BGP Routing
    • eBGP
    • iBGP
  • Administrative Distance
  • Route Summarization
  • Route Suppression
  • Route Import
  • Route Export
  • Inter-VR Peering

About Author

Metha Chiewanichakorn, CCIE#23585 (Ent. Infra, Sec, SP), is a Cisco networking enthusiast with years of experience in the industry. He is currently working as a consulting engineer for a Cisco partner. As a founder of and an instructor at labminutes.com, Metha enjoys learning and challenges himself with new technologies.

4 comments

In scenerio 4, Export: 172.16.0.4/32, Prepend AS 100 100 should the AS Path Prepend should be number 2 not 3.

Internet#SHOW ip bgp 172.16.0.4/32
BGP routing table entry for 172.16.0.4/32, version 16
Paths: (1 available, best #1, table default)
Not advertised to any peer
Refresh Epoch 1
100 100 (NOT 100 100 100)

The scenrio asked to prepend two more AS instances to make the total of 100 100 100 so the number 3 should be correct per KT below.

https://knowledgebase.paloaltonetworks.com/KCSArticleDetail?id=kA14u0000...

The Palo Alto URL is contradicted to your SEC0300-Diagram. Part 4 you should stated Prepend AS 1000 100 100, or you should say AS Path Prepend value as 3. but you put Prepend AS 100 100 meaning 2 times

You are correct. The scenario wording is unclear. The point is the entered value should represent the number of total desired ASN instances. Thank you for pointing that out.